Absurd, Arbitrary, Ambiguous, and Abusive Twitter Suspensions
When actions screening and blocking material are not taken in
good faith under 47 U.S. Code § 230 an interactive computer
service becomes a publisher and speaker of any content
provided by a participating content provider. When such a
service deems material obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy,
excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable
from one content provider is allowable, then it cannot claim
it is not the same content from another content provider
is not objectionable by another provider.
The converse is also true. If a computer service provider
deems material NOT objectionable, it cannot in good faith
claim that same material from another content provider
obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent,
harassing, or otherwise objectionable.
Therefore, it becomes civilly and criminally liable as a
publisher and speaker of that content.
SEE: NEIL HESLIN Plaintiff vs. ALEX E. JONES, INFOWARS, LLC,
FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, and OWEN SHROYER
ALSO SEE:
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
(c)Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material
(1)Treatment of publisher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
(2)Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—
(A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]


No comments:
Post a Comment